Privacy
You are currently browsing the articles from the VoIP Digest matching the category Privacy.

Written by Skype Journal on October 4th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Uncategorized and Skype and VoIP and Security and ebay and Privacy and skypejournal and Life and Life and Competitors and freedom.
In spillover activity spurred on by the recent Hewlett-Packard "phonegate" scandal, Verizon is suing 20 data brokers
for fraudulent activity re pretexting. Pretexting is where someone
pretends to be someone else so that they can access their phone
records. Interestingly, the president and vice chair of Verizon is on
the HP board of directors. Verizon says it has spent $100,000
investigate the pretexting fraud.
In related news, Democrats in the US House of Representatives, controlled by the Republicans, stalled a bill
to make pretexting illegal. The activity is illegal in some states,
including California, where the alleged activities took place. As part
of an US House of Representatives probe into the pretexting scandal, five private investigators and at least two HP executives have been subpoenaed. HP is also under investigation in California.
Written by ewriter on October 3rd, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Security and Business and Regulation and Privacy.
The US House of Representatives has been busy subpoenaing people, including five private investigators and at least two HP executives, for the House probe into the Hewlett-Packard scandal.
The whole mess was precipitated by now-former Chair Patricia Dunn when
she had PIs access the private phone records of some board members.
Her actions were outside of any legal action such as CALEA. In fact, records were obtained by pretexting,
an illegal method that involves having people impersonate someone else
to access records. (I've had something similar happen to me. A now
ex-friend impersonated me just over ten years ago and convinced my
phone company at the time to transfer yet another person's phone bill
to my phone. After a shouting match with the company, who denied they'd
ever do such a thing - despite my friend's confession - I switched to
cell phones, and now VoIP, and have not owned a landline since.)
Written by ewriter on September 27th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Security and Regulation and Privacy.
After the arrest of five foreign nationals in Namibia providing VoIP service
without a license, as well as goings on in various Asian and African
countries in regards to VoIP, you might be wondering if VoIP is under
attack there. Marcelo Rodriguez takes a crtical look [Voxilla] at what Russell Shaw [ZD Net] and Rich Tehrani [TMC Net] are saying.
Rodriguez
points out that both Shaw and Tehrani mention "Third World" countries
as locales where VoIP seems to be under attack, possibly due to
affiliations between the government and the traditional telecoms, but
that they leave out the US as being in a similar category. (Examples: Korea and the UAE blocking Skype.) He then goes on to reveal several examples of lobbying, campaign contributions, and all-expense golf vacations.
The
Voxilla piece is very revealing and extremely politically charged. I'm
going to take my cue to up the voltage. Let's take a few separate
scenarios. First scenario, conspiracy: the entire telephony system in
North America is fully wiretapped and all calls are monitored either by
humans or machines, for whatever political purpose the real men with
power wield. Second scenario: the first scenario is crock, but phone
calls are a valuable commodity and thus extremely lucrative. Third
scenario: a combination of both the first and second scenarios.
Choose your scenario. Either way, VoIP threatens the status quo, and hence spawns acts like CALEA, possibly attacks on Vonage's share price, and debates like neutrality vs tiered Internet
service. Everything that is happening politically in telephony
satisfies one of those three scenarios. Let's face it: VoiP is a threat
no matter how you slice your political pie.
Written by ewriter on September 25th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Security and Networks and Regulation and Privacy.
President Asks For Warrantless Wiretaps
US president George
Bush is asking for warrantless wiretaps, particularly in relation to
prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay. [via CNBC TV] Recently, US District
Court Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ordered a halt to the wiretapping
program, concluding in her report that warrantless wiretapping is unconstitutional. CALEA
allows a backdoor for law enforcement agencies to wiretap calls if
public security is threaten. However, the wiretapping program in
question was secretly signed by President Bush in 2001.
Telus Corp Wins 5-Yr Telecom Contract
The
government of the Province of Ontario (Canada) awarded Telus Corp
(second-largest Canadian phone company) a five-year, Cdn$140 M contract
to manage and supply various network services, including IP
communication. [via CNW] Telus recently announced that they were converting to an income trust.
Yahoo Messenger Plugins: Pandaf Sudoku Battle
Not sick of the immensely popular Sudoku number puzzles? The Pandaf Sudoku Battle plugin for Yahoo! Messenger 8
lets you battle against an opponent. I assume you race to finish first.
This is of course quite the variation on the puzzle, as it's
traditionally a one-player challenge.
Stratus Techologies Acquires Emergent
Stratus Technologies announced the US$10 M buyout of Emergent Network Solutions [Extreme VoIP], a VoIP infrastructure company.
Written by ewriter on September 15th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Software and Security and Networks and Business and Privacy.
Jupiter Web is giving away free copies of the Avaya edition of VoIP
Security for Dummies eBook (PDF, 68 pages) in consideration for people
joining the Avaya developer community. The link was sent to me in a
regular Jupiter Web email, so I cannot guarantee you'll be able to use
it, but I don't see why not.
The ebook is pretty "dummy-ish", in
the sense that they've simplied a wide range of IP telephony security
issues and summed each of them up in a few short paragraphs. It even
mentions privacy issues such as CALEA (Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Agencies) and a number of US govt regulations that add up to considering why you should record VoIP calls in your company.
This
is certainly not a book you would use to actually implement VoIP
security measures, but it's not a bad place to start if you feel you
don't know enough about the issues, or don't know where to start
reading about them. (The book is of course geared towards discussing
Avaya solutions, so it's not exactly vendor-neutral.) You can sign up
free (just your name, email, and job function) at this Jupiter Web page and download your copy.
Written by ewriter on September 13th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Security and Regulation and Privacy.
Your company has sensitive information and you think that one of your
high-profile board members - not employees - is leaking details to the
media. What do you do? If you're Hewlett-Packard's Chairwoman Patricia
Dunn, you hire private investigators and obtain phone records
[CRN] for the suspects. Problem is, those investigators used illegal
means to acquire those phone records. Now, the California attorney
general is investigating the whole mess.
Acts like Sarbanes-Oxley
(aka Sarbox) were designed to protect investors by instituting a number
of measures that would ensure transparency in accounting procedures of
public companies. The act might even be interpreted in such a manner
that a company would decide to record all employee conversations for Sarbox and even CALEA
reasons. In this case, however, the records of home and cell phone
calls of board member George A Keyworth were obtained, which I'm
assuming is out of the scope of both Sarbox and CALEA.
In light of this, I'm wondering if soft VoIP calls stand a chance of not
being put under the domain of CALEA. Soft VoIP does not yet have a
backdoor (for law enforcement) for recording calls, but some
politicians are pushing for it, for dubious reasons.
Written by ewriter on September 6th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Security and Regulation and Privacy.
Recent talk was that India's mobile phone market would be the largest
in the world. But not surprisingly, China might exceed that. The 400 million mobile phones
they'll produce this year make up half the world's output and will be
used in other countries, but they could just as well be used there, too.
As for India, its come a long way. One East Indian friend joked to me that in India,
even the janitor has a cell phone. Which was not meant to be
derogatory, but to indicate how far the country has come. Not so long
ago, it had daily power outages, but now has the juice to drive
cellular networks that include everyone in several financial classes.
However,
with the increasing number of middle-class citizens in China, it's more
than possible that the Chinese mobile market may exceed India's, where
they're focusing on IPTV for some reason. The VoIP market in Asia in general is growing. Though with issues such as VoIP service being illegal in China, I'm not sure if certain types of phones and PDAs are allowed in the country or not.
Even if China and India actually run close numbers for mobile use, broadband use in China is growing at about 80% annually and expected to reach 130 million users by 2010. Part of the increase will be a side effect of hosting the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing.
Given
the political situation in China, and the fact that VoIP is illegal
there, it might be difficult to understand how that government would
allow the estimated 80 million users playing online games. When you run
a country banning the use of certain words in print or online, it's
hard to let any sort of digital interaction go unmonitored. This sort
of atmosphere would permeate into a lot of things, including the way
events are handled and technologies deployed.
However, dig deep
into the history of the Olympics during the time that Juan Antonio
Samaranch was top dog of the IOC (International Olympics Committee),
and you'll see that the Olympics actually were repeatedly granted to
countries and regions where there was political, civil, and/or social
unrest,. The net result of hosting the Olympics in those locales
actually improved conditions considerably.
Whether or not this
happens in China, resulting in more open government policies, remains
to be seen. But if it does, China will likely dominate in Internet use
whether, whether mobile or stationary, and there will be an explosion
of VoIP services and possibly some innovations.
Written by ewriter on September 5th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Networks and Services and Regulation and Privacy.
Comverse's
fugitive CEO, Jacob Alexander, who is wanted on securities fraud
charges, apparently was traced to a town in Sri Lanka (island country
off the south coast of India) because of a one minute Skype call to the
US that he made. It's unclear whether CALEA
was enforced, since soft VoIP services are not currently bound by it.
But Skype does record the incoming IP address. Someone was obviously
monitoring the recipient's computer. More details at VoIP News and The Register.
Comverse Technology is involved in a number of businesses and had recently purchased Netcentrex and more recently Netonomy (real-time billing and customer management).
Written by ewriter on August 25th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Skype and Business and Privacy.
Philips is giving Australian customers a choice for combining VoIP with PSTN.
They now have a couple of cordless handsets that either use Microsoft
Live or Skype (not both). You do need a PC and a broadband Internet
connection to use the phones. [via The VoIP Weblog]
Because
Baby Boomers are expected to migrate to specific urban or rural areas
over the next twenty years or so, companies like ComSpan will beneft
from offering triple play services. [via VoIP Magazine; free registration required]
Asterisk has just release a free voicemail client, Tycho, for Win32, Linux x86, and Mac OS X computers. [via Asterisk VoIP News] I assume Tycho has nothing to do with Tycho Softworks - who offer an open source telephony stack - but I could be mistaken.
Written by ewriter on August 21st, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Software and Services and Regulation and Privacy.
Wiretapping
is unconstitutional says US District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in
Detroit, Michigan. She ordered a halt to the wiretapping program which
was apparently secretly authorized by President Bush in 2001. The actual action will be delayed until another hearing on Sep 7/06.
While privacy
advocates are no doubt happy, not everyone thinks Judge Taylor reasoned
well in her decision and have criticized her as a Liberal, despite that
her verdict was based on a number of Act violations.
One of the most important comments in her 43-page decision (or as the Washington Post calls it, "opinion") is the following:
... are no hereditary Kings in America and no powers not created by the Constitution.
This
standing of hers is quite likely the primary basis for her detailed
decision, and since it is aimed directly at President Bush, is the
reason why "Congressional Republicans quickly condemned" her ruling.
See the Washington Post [via 21Talks ] for more details.
Written by ewriter on August 21st, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Regulation and Privacy.
CALEA,
or Communcations Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, has a lot of
misconceptions surrounding it in terms of its applicability to VoIP, as
well as security issues. The IT Association of America (ITAA) has isued a report (PDF, 21 pgs) to educate VoIP service providers. [source: TMC Net]
The
deadline for CALEA compliance for VoIP providers is May 14, 2007, and
the ITAA questions the ability of smaller providers to comply in time,
due to the expected financial cost. Amongst other things, they also
question whether standards can be developed for CALEA for VoIP because
of all the different VoIP types. The ITAA paper includes Vinton Cerf of Google as an author.
Another group, GLIIF (Global Lawful Interception Industry Forum) issued a rebuttal (PDF, 8 pages) with pretty much the exact same title as the ITAA document.
My
pure gut instinct says that the GLIIF report sounds like a bunch of
companies protecting their own investment in future CALEA solutions,
because my educated guess indicates that their main rebuttal points are
in turn refutable. In fact, from the glance I had at the GLIIF
document, it contradicts the opinions and public statements about CALEA
made by many well-known Internet experts earlier this year.
However,
that's just my feeling, and without reading both documents thoroughly,
I'm not make any definitive declarations. Ultimately, whether I support
it or not, I think all types of VoIP calls will be wiretapped -
maybe not immediately because of technical issues, but eventually. It's
been that way for decades with PSTN lines, and governments are just not
going to give up that kind of surveillance power. (Having worked for
telcos, I've heard things that worry me, but things aren't going to
change, especially in the current climate of fear.)
Written by ewriter on August 15th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Security and Regulation and Privacy.
Hackers-cum-researchers performed an interesting security-testing
experiment earlier this year using VoIP phone numbers and Internet
social networks. They presented their findings recently at Defcon.
Their
primary plan was to determine if secret signals could be passed right
out in the open, from enemy agencies to their agents. They theorized
that the use of social networks to transmit carrier messages might
increase the noise ratio so that it would be harder for "unauthorized
parties" to decode the secret but publicly-transmitted messages.
This is in fact a technique already used covertly by intelligence agencies. However, they use shortwave numbers stations, and all governments have denied such operations. The general technique is to broadcast streams of seemingly nonsensical numbers or words, often in a female or child's voice. Of course, the stream represents a code, and only a few parties have the cipher to decode it.
Strom
Carlson, a security researcher, and the hackers collective Project Evil
teamed up to see if someone could do the same thing using the Internet,
particularly using any of the abundant social networks out there. What
they did was set up their own numbers stations. But instead of using
shortwave transmissions, they used VoIP phone numbers and recordings.
If you called such a number, you would hear a stream of code words.
They advertised the existence of the VoIP numbers stations using
Craigslist pages, using fake messages, to see if anyone would
participate.
In short, they were successful getting others with
a cryptographic interest to participate and decode messages using a
one-time key. They figure enemy forces could be too. This is something
proponents of CALEA
may want to take note of: if hostile parties want to use VoIP, they are
not necessarily going to use unencoded messages. (On the other hand,
this experiment by Carlson might just give CALEA proponents more
fodder.)
CALEA stands for Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act,
and, in short, gives any Law Enforcement agency the right to wiretap
communications networks, including the Internet and VoIP, in special
circumstances. Although to date, it's not on the agenda to tap soft VoIP calls using clients such as GoogleTalk and Skype.
Of
course, there are those people that believe that email spam is being
used as numbers stations for intelligence communications. Although who
is behind it is hard to say. (I particularly notice some interesting
word patterns in the spam in my university alumni email account.) Public key cryptography
concepts date back centuries, and the Internet is a perfect
distribution vehicle. Just never thought VoIP could be used as a
supplementary broadcasting outlet.
Additional sources: Slashdot, Homeland Stupidity, Defcon.
Written by ewriter on August 8th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Security and Networks and Privacy.

Written by Skype Journal on July 28th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Skype and VoIP and ebay and Privacy and Skypeæ‚å¿— and events and skypejournal and Life and Life and community.
Om Malik paints an interesting VoIP application scenario with an in-beta service called Jangl. Jangl deals with issues of VoIP presence
as well as security using a unique bidirectional phone number that
allows two parties to communicate without revealing their own phone
numbers.
The example Om gives is one applying to the dating scene. Considering that there are online dating services like Verbdate,
which integrate Skype's VoIP software to allow people to talk to each
other for free, there's obviously a market for VoIP dating
applications. But with the way the world is, partial anonymity, or at
least security from having to reveal personal info, is a boon. Jangl
does this by assigning a phone number between two parties, which acts
as a bridge, regardless of the numbers they are using to make the call.
Jangl joins the growing list of new companies that are opting for private financing
instead of going IPO. However, history shows that when a VC firm pumps
in money, they want to not only make their money back but get a return
on it. That's kind of why VCs exist, right?
Jangl is only in beta, so it's yet to be seen whether they can make money from their model. Still, with all the free VoIP options available these days, the ones taking advantage of the Long Tail
phenomena will be most likely to succeed. That is, give away parts of
your service/ product offerings for free, and hope that a large number
of people will use your paid services once in a while. Or if you're
lucky, frequently. (Which is why I think that Skype's plan to enter the
enterprise VoIP market is a bad idea, besides the fact that their Skype is not enterprise grade.)
But since so much VoIP service is free, it's the companies that give good value-added services at a reasonable price who are candidates for business success.
Here's
my jaded prediction: new tech (and web 2.0) companies will continue to
stay private for the next year or two, followed by a large number of
IPO offerings in the very late 00s, capped by a market crash in 2010.
History (i.e., market data and news archives) shows a recession at the
beginning of every decade since at least 1970, which inevitably means
tech stocks crash and burn. Only those VoIP companies who develop a
stable footing in the next year or two are likely to survive, and that
means having private funding, instead of suffering the vagaries of the
stock market and suddenly finding that cash is low.
Written by ewriter on July 17th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Networks and Services and Business and Privacy.
As mentioned in the previous post, CALEA and Sarbox regulations are reasons you should record corporate VoIP.
The problem is, VoIP does not lend itself well to wiretapping.
Fortunately, VoIP carriers have until May 2007 to comply, which
provides the industry nearly a year to work out a solution.
While
Sarbox is aimed at publicly-traded businesses, CALEA applies to any
business or private citizen. Even people that do not use VoIP could be
affected by this act.
Some of the drawbacks of eavesdropping on
VoIP data for CALEA is that more than just voice traffic has to be
captured. Thus, a significant amount of irrelevant data has to be
filtered out, including other VoIP users calls. What it amounts to,
from a privacy perspective, is that some law enforcement official could
then know a private citizen's every activity online. This goes
beyond the objective to wiretap calls "of interest" and moves towards
something potentially more sinister.
There are also other
technical issues such as firewalls, and even Wi-Fi access that is not
secured. For example, if you have a Wi-Fi network at home but have left
it as open access, either because you don't care or don't know how to
secure it, you might have a problem. What if your scruffy-looking
neighbour across the street conducts questionable phone calls from his
VoWiFi (VoIP over Wi-Fi) handset using your Wi-Fi?
Similar
issues will probably suuround calls over Municipal Wi-Fi. For example,
a project in Taipei City, Taiwan, expects to have 200,000 VoIP phones in use,
by year's end, by administrative and public school workers. After that,
they hope that private citizens will use the network for VoWiFi calls.
How do you wiretap VoWiFi calls that could be made anywhere in the
city, outdoors or indoors?
Another question people are asking: should CALEA extend to soft clients
such as Skype? Truth is, I wouldn't be surprised if text IM clients
such as Google Talk or any of the Messenger-type of software are already
"monitored". But VoIP clients are another issue.
Sources: Network World [via FierceVoIP]
Written by ewriter on July 14th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Regulation and Privacy.
A group of internet security experts have said that the efforts of the U.S. government which requires VoIP providers to permit law enforcement agencies to wiretap phone calls could result in cyber security problems to the internet.
Wiretapping would be requiring either a massive re-engineering of the internet or introduction of broad security risks. This could also stall innovations in the fields of internet in the U.S. as hundreds and thousands of dollars would be required for the set up and maintenance by the VoIP providers and other internet applications which provide voice services.
Via pcworld
Written by gautam.chabbra on June 15th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Privacy.
As per a study conducted the Information Technology Association of America, it says that since VoIP relies on a different network architecture from that of traditional phone lines therefore it would result in enormous costs to the industry and could even cause security risks. This report is in response to snooping being permitted on VoIP networks.
The report also states that it would not be possible for the government to expect all products that make use of VoIP to comply with the FCC requirements mandating wiretapping backdoors for government surveillance. The requirement is being backed by Bush administration.
Via silicon
Written by gautam.chabbra on June 13th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Privacy.
Pretty Good Privacy PGP creator Zimmerman is likely to launch Zfone, a free VoIP encryption program for Windows. Zimmerman launched Zfone for Mac and Linux sometime back this year. Zfone as designed by PGP creator will provide standard VoIP service to the users. Zimmerman's IP service will able to maintain secrecy in the communication.
The striking feature of Zfone is that it does not need a web of computers to hold the keys or long numbers. Rather it carries out the communication process inside the digital voice channel. Hence a third party has no keys.
Via: [VoIP Central]
Written by gautam.chabbra on May 22nd, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Privacy.
VoIP services have been blocked in the recent past in a number of countries in the Middle East. One of them, Jordan, recently reversed their decision and will unblock Skype in particular. The UAE (United Arab Emirates), however, have held to their ban.
Word is that this ban may
be lifted by the TRA (Telecommunications Regulatory Authority). The UAE
is blocking Skype and other VoIP services in some of the Emirates,
including Dubai and Oman. On the other hand, other reports indicate
that the TRA has claimed they are not ready to lift the ban just yet.
They may be working with Etislalat and Du to license VoIP, but other
services, including Skype, would probably remained blocked. That is,
mostly legacy/ incumbent telecom providers would be allowed.
Seems
to me like the status quo just found a way to remain the status quo -
at least in small countries where the powers that be can gain something
by blocking and selectively unblocking VoIP. The question is, are they
doing this to gain monetarily or so that all calls can be monitored
discreetly somewhere in a warehouse? Not to say that larger countries
don't do they very same thing, but they don't block VoIP for the entire
nation. The interesting thing, if I've understood correctly, is that a
very large percentage of the UAE populace is made of foreigners (to
them). So having affordable long distance rates to call friends and
family is of high importance.
In short, for most people, especially fans of VoIP and VoIM clients such as Skype, AIM, MSN Messenger or Yahoo Messenger, there's no hope for their unblocking in the near future in the UAE.
[sources: Gulf News, TradeArabia, 7Days, VoIP News AU]
Written by ewriter on January 1st, 1970 with no comments.
Read more articles on Skype and Services and Regulation and Privacy.
There's talk lately about futuristic applications, called crowdsensing,
where cell phones with sensors are collectively used to predict weather
or even the need for extra transit vehicles, etc. But the fact is,
mobile handsets are already used in similar applications such as
detecting traffic gridlock. This is what IntelliOne and AirSage are
doing, starting in Atlanta, Georgia, with plans to expand to other
locations in the US and Canada, including some unspecified location in
the province of Ontario - which I assume must be Toronto.
Considering
that Atlanta and Toronto are reputed to be the two absolute worst
traffic hotspots in North America, that wouldn't be surprising. I've
lived, driven, and worked in both Atlanta and Toronto metro areas, and
that assessment is probably 100% accurate. I've literally been stuck in
traffic 2 hrs going in and 3 hrs going out on particularly bad days.
Transit isn't always any better, especially for those who live outside
of either metro area. Privacy issues about being track notwithstanding,
drivers in both metropolitan areas might be grateful for a solution
that lets them bypass problem areas, even if they have to pay a monthly
fee. Just don't tell your boss you were stuck in traffic if you weren't.
[sources: Globe and Mail]
Written by ewriter on January 1st, 1970 with no comments.
Read more articles on Networks and Phones and Privacy.
Today, someone sent me my first real Skype spam (skam?) from Khurana +
Company, possibly from Austin, Texas. (Text mode, not voice.) You spam me and I'll reveal you
to everyone. I didn't bother reading the Skype message, but I think
he's a lawyer, or offers some sort of legal services by Skype and
email, not surprisingly. But don't assume that just because I have an
East Indian (or similar) name like you that I'll be sympathetic to your
business - or for whatever reason you picked me - especially if you
approach me in this manner.
It's not vishing,
but it's annoying. The first thing I'll do is block you permanently,
the second announce you so that others watch out for your spam. Pick
another way to advertise yourself; this is just bad publicity for you,
equivalent to cold-calling me on the phone, which would earn you a
nasty tirade.
Skype, you need to build a list of people that do
this without the callee's permission and auto-block them. Will that
work, you think? Anyone care to weigh in? On the other hand, Drew
Barrymore and Beyonce can call me at any time, especially for a
conference call, no matter what they're selling.
Written by ewriter on January 1st, 1970 with no comments.
Read more articles on Skype and Software and Privacy.
My first reaction to Jangl, an
anonymity proxy service for phone numbers, was is that necessary? But
dig a bit deeper and you find out there is value - albeit probably to a
specific niche. But as niches go, it's potentially a big one. Jangl
creates a unique phone number for any pair of people. It saves you from
handing out your real phone number to someone, if you're not ready for
that, but allows you to both communicate. Alec Saunders has some more details,
garnered from a chat with Tim Johnson and CEO Michael Cerda. The
service is being geared towards a dating community, for example.
Consider
the mechanics behind generating unique call numbers between pairs of
people. If you have, say, 1,000 members in a dating community, how many
possible unique pairs of people do you have? C(1000, 2) = 1000-choose-2
combinations = [1000!/ (1000-2)!]/2! = 1000!/ 2x998! = 1000x999/2 =
nearly a half-million generated numbers to serve all possible matchups,
if I remember my math correctly. Of course, any one person wouldn't
have to know all those numbers. But there's a lot of number management
behind the scenes. More details to come.
Written by ewriter on January 1st, 1970 with no comments.
Read more articles on Software and Networks and Privacy.
It's pure coincidence but as I'm working on this brief article, I've just finished hearing Led Zeppelin's classic Communication Breakdown song. Radio 3net has their own 500 top albums for listening for free online. Yeah, 500. And all the classics are there; all you need is Windows Media Player to listen.
That
said, this is a brief overview of some of the issues that could make or
break how widespread IP communications becomes. Or at least delay
ubiquity.
- Countrywide bans.
First, numerous countries in the Middle East and some in Asia (China, South Korea) either fully or partially banned VoIP services
- except to the status quo providers in some cases. Then India, who
recently allowed Yahoo to provide VoIP services, decided they were
going to ban outside providers.
- Jail sentences.
Seriously?! Vietnam sentenced
a South Korean business man to 16 years in jail after he set up five
VoIP systems in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City (formerly known as Saigon).
It's amazing to think that in the 21st century, there are still people
in power who are short-sighted. Or do such people just gravitate to
government? Why not absolve him, make him pay a provider fee and a
fine, and actually utilize his entrepreunerial spirit? That would
actually make sense. This is a similar VoIP crime to what five Asian men did in Namibia, but were out on bail.
- e911, e999, emergency services.
Or lack of them. Let's not forget that 911 in the United States was not
ubiquitous until, I believe, the late 80s. Still, that's no excuse. In E911 still struggling after 10 years,
Wayne Rash says that there's a 16% chance your wireless 911 call won't
go through, or that the emergency center won't know where you are. Sad
but true. (I didn't know that it's been 10 years since the US FCC
mandated e911, aka enhanced 911.) In the UK, they call it 999, and
pending regulations by Ofcom (the regulator) could put lives at risk according to ITSPA (Internet Telephony Services Providers Association).
- Perceived security issues re closed protocols.
I.e., Skype, which in some cases is the reason countries, corporations and universities have banned Skype in particular.
- Wiretapping.
Let's not be naive. Several countries including those considered democracies already have widespread wiretapping
in place, whether you know it or not. But Internet tech experts have
openly said that architecting a backdoor into VoIP soft clients is not
only very difficult but a bad idea.
Written by ewriter on January 1st, 1970 with no comments.
Read more articles on Security and Services and Regulation and Privacy.
-- Pushpa Sathish, Staff Writer
It’s bad enough that your email is littered with spam, but can you imagine the frustration that occurs with voice spam? Picking up your phone just to hear an automated marketing call is the pits, especially when you’re in the middle of something important. These are the times when you wish you were important enough to merit a secretary who would screen your calls for you!
Well, NEC is doing its bit to keep out the voice spammers. The company announced the creation of an innovative technology that helps block VoIP spam. How? By identifying if a caller is human or machine after testing the caller’s capability to carry on a human-like conversation. The humans are let through while the androids are shown the door to the dumpster.
The company said that the product could be tailored to function well with most types of hardware, including SIP servers, home network equipment and session border controls. It’s come out with flying colors in tests against known botnets; NEC said that the technology was successful in identifying nearly all the VoIP spam thrown at it.
The new development, which is in its initial stages, will be showcased at the 3GSM World Congress in Barcelona later this month. And if you’re putting plans to hire a secretary on hold, I’d advise you against it – no specific date has been set for the commercial launch of NEC’s technology.
Written by pushpa27 on January 1st, 1970 with no comments.
Read more articles on Privacy.
The US FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) reported well over 200,000
cyber complaints for 2005. These included cases of harrassment,
stalking and generally inappropriate behavior, some via VoIP or VoIM
soft clients such as Skype or Yahoo Messenger.
While I am fortunate not to have been harrassed to date, I do get cold-called by VoIP or VoIM increasingly of late, and usually by Skype.
However, that may be because I have my SkypeMe status turned to "on".
The FBI suggests that if you use Skype, that you turn off SkypeMe to
avoid unwanted calls. (Other software offers similar features.) They
also offer a few other suggestions:
- Use a gender-neutral name for publicly-displayed email addresses.
- For
such emails, use a free service like Google Mail, Yahoo Mail. or
Hotmail. This way, there's no tie-in to a web domain, for which
registration can be viewed publicly.
- Do your best not to reveal too much information about your whereabouts.
If you are concerned for your safety and security for any reason, please contact the appropriate authorities.
[via PR Web]
Written by ewriter on January 1st, 1970 with no comments.
Read more articles on Skype and Software and Security and Privacy.