A day after Google co-founder Sergey Brin said he was having second thoughts about the decisions and compromises the search giant made when it came to China, China is reportedly blocking the main Google.com domain, though Google.cn, the censored version of Google is not being affected. Retribution? What do you think?
Legislation was introduced today by Senator McCain to push forward a la carte TV programming. Personally, I'd like to have a la carte satellite TV programming, naked DSL or naked broadband cable, and a reliable VoIP service provider.
Alas, I am still overpaying for cable TV and only get like 4 HDTV channels. I'd love to switch to satellite TV, but would still need to keep at least basic cable in order to keep my high-speed broadband cable connection. It is not very cost effective to switch to basic cable plus pay for satellite channels. Satellite Internet access is a joke, and I'd be in the same bundling boat if I switched to DSL broadband, since very few offer naked DSL - where you don't need to also pay for basic phone service. In addition to a la carte programming, Senator McCain, or someone in the Senate, needs to push forward a bill that allows consumers to purchase Internet access not bundled with phone service (DSL) and not bundled with cable TV service.
It's a damn racket, I tell ya! They need to make all services a la carte - channels you want, broadband access service you want, and which TV provider you want. This bundling crap is actually more expensive and forces consumers to stay with specific providers to try and get the best value - even if the service is inferior to competitors. For instance, with satellite TV I can get over 185 digital channels (many HDTV with surround sound), versus 120 channels for cable, most of which are not digital, not HDTV and not surround sound.
On a related note, RCN Corporation (NASDAQ: RCNI), a leading provider of triple play cable, high-speed Internet and phone services, today issued the following statement on draft legislation introduced by Senator John McCain (R-Arizona):
"We are pleased to see that this bill pushes forward the concept of themed a la carte family programming," said RCN Senior Vice President of Strategic and External Affairs Richard Ramlall. "Since August 2004, our company has expressed a willingness to test consumer reaction to themed program tiers on our digital systems. Most recently we met with Federal Communications Chairman Kevin Martin and indicated we would be willing to conduct a trial in Boston.
"We believe that themed a la carte tiers would greatly enhance consumer choice by allowing them to choose from an array of smaller programming tiers, limited to the kind of categories of programming they most want and value. At the same time it would support development of new and diverse programming in those categories," explained Ramlall.
"However, we've been frustrated in our effort to develop such offerings by the impediments imposed by programmers. Many of them are owned or controlled by the largest incumbent cable operators, who require tying arrangements and other contractual restrictions that preclude RCN and other competitive providers from offering consumer-driven programming options."
Amen to that! Maybe we can amend the Net Neutrality bill being proposed? What say you all?
Both Chris Lyman, CEO of Fonality, and Andrew Gillis, the founder of Asterisk@Home - now Trixbox, responded to my previous post pondering the relationship between Trixbox and Fonality. Long story short, it looks like the open-source Trixbox project is safe from any commercial intentions. Just a case of one Linux-based commercial company helping out a Linux hobbyist. You just gotta love the Linux community!
Also, interesting to read how the name "trixbox" came about:
Tom: So what’s the deal with Trixbox. I thought I read you were the registrar of this domain a few days ago, but now it’s registered to a registrar “anonymous” proxy service.
Chris: We helped him with the domain registration (we are old hosting guys, my CTO and I ran one of the largest hosting companies in the world before selling it to a telephone company in 2000.) Andrew may have changed the domain service when he got worried that it might appear that Fonality was trixbox. (Actually I) checked about the domain. To be honest, I now do *not* think that my CTO helped him register the domain, but I could be wrong. But I do know that we are paying for the hosting of the site, and helped Andrew with a bunch of things including legal advice, etc.
Tom: Are you running the show with Trixbox – the replacement for Asterisk@Home?
Chris: No it is Andrew’s show. We provide him free hosting and bandwidth. He is very much the owner and leader of that community. Andrew and Fonality have begun to closely work together as of late because a) we wanted them to bake HUDlite into trixbox b) we wanted to get to know the Asterisk open source community a bit better. So far the relationship has been good. Andrew agreed to bake HUDlite into trixbox, which gives us access to all his users. And, he has taught us a lot about the mindset of the Asterisk hobbyist. In exchange we have done him some favors. We help sponsor him wherever we can, including: web-hosting, bandwidth, we sent him a PBXtra to play with, etc.
Tom: Anything behind the name change? Did Mark Spencer send a cease and desist to protect a trademark on the name “Asterisk”? (assuming he trademarked Asterisk)
Chris: Andrew told me that he got an email from Digium a long time ago, stating that Asterisk was their trademark. I didn’t know of any legal letter…so you may know more than I know. I thought it was all pretty casual.
Tom: How much control (if any) do you have over the Trixbox development?
Chris: Very little. Unless Andrew really likes something I say to him I guess.
Tom: Is the plan to simply convert over Trixbox users to Fonality?
Chris: Trixbox is a free open source community – largely international. Fonality is a commercial paid product, largely domestic. We couldn’t be farther apart in communities, interest, or financial objectives. I guess our only real common ground is a usage and love of Asterisk.
And here's a response from Andrew from Trixbox regarding my blog post
Andrew: I created Asterisk@Home a year ago on a whim. I thought what a great idea to make Asterisk easy to install. It very quickly grew much bigger than I thought it would. One day Digium contacted me and told me that Asterisk is their trademark but I could use it as long as my project remained totally open source.
This sounded good from the start but it put restrictions of the product such as loosing the ability to use free (not open source) software. Then theres my user base. As it turns out most of my users were running Asterisk@Home for business and they didn’t like the name.
The Asterisk@Home name also pigeon holes the product into being an Asterisk distribution. I want to make it more than that and include other type of software. I want it to do more tricks. So the new name trixbox.
I do own the trixbox.org name. I register all my domains using anonymous servers. Hope this helps out. If you are interested in doing a review of trixbox or an interview with me. Just let me know.
Before you jump the gun and label this article as Trash or Nonsense let me tell you the answer is Yes! Thanks to Intel. Intel Corp. during the Computex 2006 Exhibition in Taipei revealed a product, which will allow you to make VoIP calls using your existing telephones.
More about the Product:
Labeled Intel 600SM, it is PCI phone adaptor which is basically a add-in card that allows phone interface. With it comes the software, called the SoftPhone agent. Once configured this phone will allow you to not only call regular landline numbers as before but also cell phones using various services, including engin (an Australian VoIP provider), Packet8, Skype or yak. This new adaptor will definitely make it easier for those who are reluctant to change over to the special phones required to make VoIP calls. Additionally it will also reduce the phone bills as well. It will also greatly enhance voice quality.
With Skype being the only real universal VoIP provider till date it seems like most people will have to depend on its service to make VoIP calls except in places where local providers exist. The downside of this is that you may not be able to make any emergency calls as Skype does not support it. It means if you want to make emergency calls you will have to have a regular phone in addition to your converted phone to make your distress calls.
Should you buy it?
You have to ask yourself two questions then: Do I change over to a VoIP connection buying the Intel 600SM and save a few bucks on my phone bills or Is my neighborhood generally unsafe warranting the need for distress calls often? In there, lies the answer to whether you should go for it or not.
Apparently, development on Asterisk@Home, the "turnkey" Asterisk solution with many third-party add-ons pre-installed has ended. However, the developers have created a new product called Trixbox. Just like Asterisk@Home, Trixbox is a complete Asterisk PBX including, a Linux OS, Asterisk PBX software, a Web GUI, and many other useful add-ons. As with Asterisk@Home, Trixbox can be quickly installed in less than an hour.
Besides being reminded of that wacky Trix rabbit character, I'd be curious why the need for the name change, especially since Trixbox is based on the same exact source code as Asterisk@Home. I liked the Asterisk@Home name - it gave the product a connotation of being "easy" to use and install. (e.g. even a "home" user could install it, or it was designed for a "home installation" by a hobbyist or entrepreneur.)
I can speculate that my pal Mark Spencer over at Digium sent Asterisk@Home a "cease & desist letter" to protect his trademark. Although, I'm not sure if Mark even has a trademark on the brand "Asterisk". I'll have to shoot him off an email and ask. But if he does, then you can't blame him if he is indeed trying to protect his brand. If you don't vigorously protect your brand and it becomes watered down and used by everyone, then you can lose your rights to the trademark. This whole point may be moot since I believe you can't trademark GPL open-source code projects. Where's a trademark lawyer when you need one?
[Update: I received an email from Ward Mundy stating that Digium did give permission to use the Asterisk@Home name. He stated "Asterisk@Home was suitable for home and business use. A lot of customers were apparently put off by the @Home moniker." I suppose I can see the @Home moniker hurting its "business-class" image.]
In any event, the latest release of Trixbox 1.0 (technically Asterisk@Home v3.0) was released on May 31st (less than a week ago). Interestingly enough, I noticed that Fonality is offering their HUDLite softphone client for Trixbox. I just shot off an email to Chris Lyman over at Fonality to see what exactly the relationship is between Fonality and Trixbox, especially since I could have sworn that I saw Fonality as the one that registered the trixbox.org domain.
However, when I checked the whois database today, it's registered to one of those "anonymizing" proxy domain registrars with a date stating it just changed on 6/5/06 (just 2 days ago). I then did some more investigating to see if I could figure out who owned trixbox.org. I won't get into too many details on how I figured it out, but suffice to say I did a whois on www.hudlite.org, which is registered to Fonality, Inc. I then looked at the IP address for this whois record and it displayed "66.234.135.90". I then do a whois on trixbox.org and lo' and behold the IP addresses were the same! Apparently trixbox.org and www.hudlite.org are running on the same web server and using the host header to figure out which web page to display.
Did Fonality by out the rights to Asterisk@Home and then change the name to Trixbox.org? What does this mean for the popular open-source Asterisk@Home distro (now Trixbox) considering Fonality is a for-profit Asterisk solutions provider? Is the plan to try and convert Trixbox users (generally novice Linux users) into paying Fonality users? Fonality certainly focuses on businesses that have little or no Linux experts, so there is certainly a potential synergy there. Well, the mystery continues... I'll post more when I hear back from Chris @Fonality.
Finally, Nerd Vittles has an excellent three-part series on how to install Trixbox along with FreePBX, a web-based GUI add-on for making Asterisk easy to manage. If you ever wanted to try Asterisk, but find Linux a bit daunting, then head on over to Nerd Vittles and try the tutorial.
Lipstick.com is really SubReddit. In other words while Conde Nast might own it, Reddit really is the engine behind it. Or as someone just said: it smells like an (OEM) deal. While the domain is owned by Condenast, the Address records for Lipstick and Reddit are pretty close: 72.5.28.217 and 72.5.28.218. So what do I really think about Lipstick.com? Find out here!
I really wonder what all this discussions about how to intercept VoIP calls and make VOIP CALEA compliant is about. The NSA is monitoring all Internet traffic anyway (courtesy by AT&T, Verizon et. al.), as is stated e.g. here. This also well known even in Austria and Germany.
There even exists a video showing the guys in the NSA Telephone Monitoring Center making fun out of all of you.
Tivo as a platform strategy is beginning to take shape, and the company is making moves that will pay-off in the long run.
Take today’s announcement. According to TVPredictions.com, they are adding more content providers to the mix. The experiment with C/Net’s technology videos must be working well for them to sign-on more content partners. Those who could be beaming their videos to TiVo users with broadband enabled boxes (about 10% of the total 4.4 million subscribers) include the NBA, and iVillage. Others whose content will show-up on include broadband content providers such as Heavy.com.
Now if they could add more such video content to the mix - say by buying someone like Akimbo - TiVo can start to show a new kind of value proposition. Of course the real value is in bringing web-based video selections from say You Tube or Google video to the living room would further enhance the value of the DVR maker. “There’s this exploding video availability on the Web,” TiVo CEO Tom Rogers told USA Today. “But for most people it’s not real until it’s on your TV.” Amen to that!
Sonus Networks, provider of VoIP technology solutions, has introduced the Self-care Access Portal as part of its Sonus certified Voice over Broadband (VoBB) system, in collaboration with fellow VoIP technology provider Atreus Systems. According to the agreement, Atreus will become a member of Sonus’ Open Service Partner Alliance (OSPA), and thus be able to offer service providers an integrated portal for the automation of VoIP configuration and management. TMC Net reports:
The portal will also deliver a Web-based self-care service for consumer VoIP; a user-driven voice feature configuration; detailed logs of incoming, outgoing and missed calls; voicemail download and playback, and an entry-level system for an easier migration to the full self-provisioning system for Business VoIP, Wholesale VoIP and IMS-based offerings.
Microsoft Connected Services Framework, Microsoft TV IPTV Edition, Microsoft Solution for Hosted Messaging and Collaboration, Microsoft Solution for Enhanced VoIP Services, Microsoft Office Live Communications Server, Microsoft Office Communicator and Microsoft Office Live Meeting – these are just a few offerings that are being exhibited by Microsoft Corporation at GLOBALCOMM 2006, the next-generation communications marketplace and summit. All the above applications provide a wide array of integrated multimedia offerings such as voice, video, and data services for consumers, enterprises, and SMBs.
Occupying center stage is Connected Services Framework, using which telecommunications operators can aggregate, provide, and manage converged communications services that are network and device independent. The service, which was introduced last year, will see its third version launched later this month.
The QuickStart Express program from BroadSoft, provider of VoIP application software solutions for fixed and mobile operators, guarantees VoIP service providers a smooth ride as they price, package, position, and deploy VoIP services. BroadSoft claims the software simplifies the process of developing and delivering VoIP through the use of planning, sales, and deployment models, and supporting toolkits and collateral. TMC Net reports:
QuickStart Express, which is free to BroadSoft customers, outlines the deployment process in three phases: planning, customer acquisition and service delivery. The program provides instructions, templates and conceptual models backed by real-world implementation and deployment scenarios.
Let me expand the title… as Hollywood is increasingly forced to adopt the Internet as a distribution channel, should it be afraid that Google will eventually become the dominant gatekeeper for video?This question, which used to be one of the most pressing in the minds of media executives, seems to have been put on the back-burner lately due to the meteoric rise of online video sharing sites like YouTube and social networks like MySpace (not to mention Google’s own anemic efforts on the video front thus far).
Well, it would be a big mistake for Hollywood to drop the ball and not keep their eyes on Google as their primary threat, because the answer to the question is a most definite “yes”.I would go as far as to say that Google’s role as the dominant gatekeeper to online video is inevitable.And the reason why is pretty much exactly the same as the reason why Google came to be the king of search in the first place.
As we all know, Google revolutionized search by leveraging the most unique and powerful element of the web… the hyperlink.The basis of their innovation was the very simple premise that hyperlinks, and the way people use them, were a highly reliable proxy and filter for quality, relevance, and popularity.Google’s insight to use people power was actually quite counterintuitive (vs. the conventional wisdom of informational retrieval experts at the time) and it’s important to realize that if people didn’t continue to link en masse, there would be no Google.Conversely, the more people link, the more market power Google is able to usurp and wield. The strategic implications of this insight, which Google used to dominate the market for text-based search, are now about to spill-over into the world of video.
As more and more videos go online with every passing day, people will increasingly link and point to the ones they like, just like we do with text today.This will give Google the exact same opportunity with video as it had with text… they can unleash PageRank to index and aggregate video links with high popularity, relevancy, precision and recall.To a large extent, Google can just sit tight and do nothing, as it’s the people and the natural momentum of the web that will do all the heavy lifting to make this happen.Wayne Gretzky would be proud… Google already knows where the hockey puck is heading and it’s just waiting there with a clear shot at the goal.
For most in Hollywood today, the Internet is all about the challenges of going on-demand and adjusting to a non-linear programming format. And given such a mindset, most feel that it is sufficient to fortify and hide behind their war chest of copyrights and brands. But such thinking is short-sighted… what Hollywood really needs to understand about the long-term implications of the Internet is that the hyperlink is going to enable a dramatic and permanent shift in control over programming and distribution from the center (e.g.corporations) to the edge (e.g. consumers). People are increasingly becoming “social media programmers” and the continued momentum of the masses to hyperlink is a disruptive force that cannot be contained and prevented.So it’s not just about on-demand and consumer convenience, it’s about the disruptive effects of the hyperlink and the unstoppable loss of control it inflicts on “walled gardens†all types.
Given all that, what Hollywood needs to grok is that hyperlinks are to Google what spinach is to Popeye. As more and more hyperlinks to video are generated, Google will grow stronger, armed with the competency to harness the collective power and intelligence of all these links into a coordinated and unified threat. So going back to the original question… should Hollywood fear Google? The long answer is that the probability of Google becoming the dominant gatekeeper to video will be directly correlated to the amount of hyperlinks people generate over time. The short answer is… it’s inevitable
Robert Young is a serial entrepreneur who played a major role in the invention & commercialization of the world’s first consumer ISP, Internet advertising (pay-per-click ads), free email, and digital media superdistribution.
Global telecommunications service provider, Global Crossing, has introduced VoIP Integrity Service, a real-time visibility and reporting service, as an extension to its Application performance Management (APM) services. The service provides manifold advantages for enterprise network managers, including optimization of VoIP network design, real-time performance monitoring, enhanced troubleshooting techniques, and one-second increment data gathering. At the end of the day, network managers will be able to increase productivity and decrease TCO (total cost of ownership) through enhanced visibility and control over their VoIP networks. IP Communications reports:
Global Crossing's APM services enable enterprises to proactively manage the performance of any networked application, such as VoIP, video, customer relationship management (CRM), enterprise resource planning (ERP) or e-mail. APM services increase application and network availability, optimize the use of network bandwidth and reduce operating costs across traditional and converged IP-based infrastructures.
Just in time for World Cup Soccer, Skype users can now use avatars to reflect their personalities and their favorite team, thanks to Klonies. Klonies come from Comverse, a division of Comverse Technology, a telecom software providers, which had launched these avatar for mobile handsets last fall. The whole avatar business is getting interesting.
The change from IPv4 to IPv6 is taking place slowly but steadily. While the US Government has mandated the use of IPv6 for all federal agencies by 2008, South Korea is stepping up its efforts to effect the transition with the help of Caspian, provider of multimedia traffic management solutions for IP and multi-protocol label switching (MPLS) networks, and Electronic and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI).
Before we go into the details of the migration from one protocol to the other, let’s take a look at what IPv4 and IPv6 mean. IPv4 is the dominant network layer internet protocol in use today. It was the first protocol introduced, is data-oriented, and is used on packet-switched networks. IPv6 is IPv4’s successor protocol, and has the advantage of being able to support a larger number of addresses for all mobile and electronic networked devices.
Caspian and ETRI have signed a joint technology agreement, the first phase of which dealt with setting up multimedia quality of service (QoS) for South Korea’s Broadband convergence Network (BcN) initiative. The second phase, which will focus on providing IPv6 services, has just begun. Caspian and ETRI face the massive challenge of trying to accomplish the world’s first QoS implementations of IPv6, with a single gateway solution to provide access for IPv6 traffic over existing IPv4 networks. As part of the agreement, Caspian has brought to the table its flow-state QoS technology, while ETRI has contributed its expertise in MPLS and IPv6.
The first phase saw the successful deployment of Caspian’s Media Controllers in South Korea’s Electronic Government (e-Gov) network with Korea Telecom and SK Telecom. The e-Gov network covers infrastructure across the country that supports bandwidth for integrated multimedia services such as VoIP, and streaming audio and video.
Intel has come up with Intel 600SM PCI Phone Adapter which is a low profile add in card that employs several chips to enable phone interface, improved voice quality etc. Users are required to install the board, plug existing telephone and install a program called SoftPhone.
The phone adapter provides opportunities for lowering telephone bill costs and provides ease of use to those who are not familiar with special headsets for calling using computers or not willing to use a special telephone designed for VoIP services.While using this adapter one cannot make emergency calls in a number of cases.
Sonus Networks and Atreus Systems has come together to launch a self care access portal as part of the Sonus Certified Voice over Broadband system. This deal makes Atreus a member of the Sonus Open Service Partner Alliance. This partnership would enable the company to deliver an integrated portal for service providers in order to automate the configuration and management of VoIP features.
The portal would be delivering a web based self care service for consumer VoIP, detailed logs of incoming, outgoing and missed calls, detailed logs of incoming, voicemail download and playback and entry level system for an easier migration to full self provisioning systems for wholesale VoIP, business VoIP and IMS based offerings.
GlobalTouch Telecom has deployed a plug and play video over VoIP application which combines video telephony hardware and SIP software functions. It worked with Leadtek research for developing the videophones and overcame video signal handling and compression challenges.
There are two ways of making video calls, Leadtek desktop phone or GlobalTouch’s video softphone which comes with its VoIP service. The software has been developed only server side T.38 Fax support. It implies that the company can provide double fax transmission speed and higher level of transmission reliability.
Samsung Business Communication Systems has come up with a new line of VoIP and digital handsets for SMBs. Called the OfficeServ ITP-5100 series, it uses standard IP protocols and is compatible with all of Samsung’s converged and IP enabled OfficeServ systems.
As per the company reports the phone is suitable for home, remote and satellite offices. Companies could easily expand the systems by adding more sets to the LAN. All the devices have a five fixed function keys, LCD soft keys, duplex speakerphone, digital volume controls and a selection of ring tones and PoE.